JUDICIAL OPINIONS TOXICOLOGISTS SHOULD KNOW


Recchi America Inc. vs. Hall

In Hall vs. Recchi America Inc. 671 So. 2nd 197 (Florida 1st DCA 1996) the District Court of Appeals opined invalid a provision of Florida Statute that declared a positive urine for drugs (marijuana in this case) provided an irrebuttable presumption of impairment. On appeal, the Supreme Court affirmed.(Recchi America vs. Hall)

This case provides judicial recognition that a post accident drug screen is not a scientifically sufficient basis to conclude the accident was related to drug induced impairment.- E.G. Comstock
 
 

Ross vs. Ellard Construction Company

A traumatic amputation of a finger occurred in the course and scope of employment. Post injury urine drug screen tested positive for cocaine. The Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, granted a summary judgement for the employer denying benefits. Upon appeal the summary judgement was reversed on the basis that a positive DOT drug test for cocaine does not establish proximal cause. Ross vs. Ellard Construction Company, Inc. (686 So.2nd 1190) See also, American College of Medical Toxicology position statement- E.G. Comstock


If you have any questions please let me know.
 
 

            | Toxic Substance Litigation Register | Discovery | FAQ About Drugs & Alcohol | Judicial Opinions | E-Mail Dr. Comstock | Publications |